Free go resubmission or an appeal after refusal

After a refusal you have two routes, and the choice between a free go resubmission or appeal comes down to one question: was the council wrong, or was your scheme wrong. If the officer's reasons are fixable with a design change, resubmit. If you think the reasons are unsound and you want the same scheme judged again by someone independent, appeal. An appeal cannot approve a changed scheme, and a resubmission cannot tell you the council was wrong.

Both routes have deadlines that catch householders out. The fee exemption for a further application runs for twelve months from the decision. A householder appeal has to be lodged within twelve weeks. Miss either and your options narrow considerably.

What the fee exemption actually allows

The fee regulations provide for one further application without a fee, in defined circumstances. The core conditions are that a fee was paid on the first application, that the further application is for development of the same character or description, on the same site, by the same applicant, and that it is submitted within twelve months of the refusal, the withdrawal or the earlier decision.

Three points people misunderstand.

It is one exemption, not an unlimited series. Use it and a third application carries a fee.

"Same character or description" allows design changes but not a different kind of development. Reducing the depth of a rear extension and changing its roof form is the same description. Replacing it with a detached garden building is not.

The exemption covers the planning fee only. Your architect's time, any surveys and the cost of revised drawings are unaffected, and those are usually the larger numbers.

The fee regulations have been amended repeatedly, including the uplift in late 2023 and annual indexation from April 2025, and the scope of the exemption has been reviewed more than once. Check the current regulations or the national fee calculator before you assume the resubmission is free.

Timescales compared

The duration comparison is what usually settles it for a homeowner who wants to build this year. A revised application determined in eight weeks beats an appeal decided in the spring.

Where an appeal preserves your scheme

An appeal is a review of the council's decision on the application as submitted. The inspector cannot approve a modified version, and amended drawings are not normally admitted, because the public and the consultees commented on the original.

That makes an appeal the right route in four situations.

Where the scheme as designed is the one you want, and a compromise version would not be worth building. Where the refusal turns on a policy question rather than a design detail, for example whether an extension harms the character of a conservation area, and you have a properly argued case to the contrary. Where the officer recommended approval and the committee refused against that advice, because the officer's report is then evidence supporting your case. And where the council has applied a local guideline as though it were a rule, which inspectors are generally willing to look behind.

A householder appeal runs on an expedited written procedure. The appeal form and your statement are your case, and you do not get a second chance to respond later, so put the full argument in at the start. Attach the officer's report, the original drawings and any correspondence that shows what was agreed during the application.

The risk of a second refusal

A resubmission that is refused leaves you with two refusals on the planning record for the same site. That matters in three ways.

It weakens a later appeal, because an inspector reads the history. It gives a future buyer's solicitor something to ask about. And it brings the power to decline into play.

Under section 70A of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 a council may decline to determine an application where, in the preceding two years, a similar application has been refused by the Secretary of State on appeal, or refused by the council and there has been no change in the development plan or in the material considerations since. There is also a power dealing with overlapping applications where an appeal on a similar scheme is already pending.

In practice authorities use this power sparingly, and usually after a clear pattern of repeat submissions. But it exists, and a householder who submits the same drawings three times can find the fourth returned without a decision.

Running both, and whether it works

You can lodge an appeal on the refused scheme and submit a revised application at the same time. Agents do this on schemes where the client wants a fallback. It costs nothing to lodge the appeal, so the downside is the design fee on the revised scheme and the risk that the council treats the second application as overlapping.

Two cautions. Tell the case officer what you are doing, because a surprise appeal sours the conversation you need for the revised scheme. And make sure the revised scheme is a real change, not a cosmetic one, or you get two refusals instead of one.

Reading the refusal properly before choosing

The decision notice contains the reasons, and they are the whole basis for the choice. Work through them in order.

1. Separate the reasons that are about measurable things, such as depth, height, distance to a boundary or parking numbers, from the reasons that are about judgement, such as character, amenity or design quality.
2. Measurable reasons are usually fixable by revision. Judgement reasons are the ones worth appealing, if you have a case.
3. Check whether the reasons cite policies from the adopted local plan or from supplementary guidance. Local guidance carries less weight than adopted policy, and inspectors say so.
4. Look for reasons that cite harm to neighbours. If the harm is real, a revision is more honest and quicker than an appeal.
5. Read the officer's report as well as the notice. It tells you which points were marginal.
6. Ask the case officer what would make the scheme acceptable. Most will say, and the answer shapes the revision.

Where you resubmit, update the supporting documents rather than resending the originals. A short Planning Statement explaining what has changed and how each refusal reason has been addressed does more than any amount of redrawing, and where design was the issue, a Design and Access Statement is where the reasoning for the revised form belongs.

If the choice of application route was itself part of the problem, our comparison of householder and full applications sets out which route fits which project.

One honest uncertainty: the free go has been under review as part of wider fee reform, and the position may have moved since the last time your agent checked. Confirm it before you build a plan around a fee-free resubmission.

Browse all 66 PlanScope report types and start a draft.

This is general guidance, not legal advice; check the position with your local planning authority or a qualified professional before relying on it. PlanScope provides AI-assisted draft reports for planning applications. Reports should be reviewed before submission. We do not guarantee planning approval.