Seasonal Calendar

Local plan consultation windows and when to respond

7 min readBy PlanScope Editorial Team

Comments at Regulation 18 are read by officers. Comments at Regulation 19 go to the examination. Where the stages sit, how long they run and what a representation has to contain.

The local plan consultation window that matters most is the one at Regulation 19, and it runs for a minimum of six weeks. That is the stage where representations are made on the plan the council intends to submit for examination, and it is the only stage at which the inspector who examines the plan will read what you wrote. Comments made earlier are read by council officers. Comments made at Regulation 19 go to the examination.

If you have limited time and want it to count, that is where to spend it.

The stages at which a plan can be influenced

Plan preparation in England follows the Town and Country Planning (Local Planning) (England) Regulations 2012, and there are four points where the public has a formal role.

  1. Evidence gathering and call for sites, where landowners and agents submit land for consideration. No fixed period applies and the window is set by the council.
  2. Regulation 18, the preparation stage. The council consults on what the plan ought to contain. Many authorities run this twice, once on issues and options and again on a draft or preferred options plan. The period is set locally.
  3. Regulation 19, publication. The council publishes the plan it proposes to submit, and invites representations on soundness and legal compliance for a minimum of six weeks.
  4. Main modifications consultation, after the examination has begun, where the inspector's proposed changes are consulted on, again usually for six weeks.

Between those, the plan is submitted under Regulation 22, examined in public, and finally adopted. A person who made a representation at Regulation 19 and asked to be heard has a right to appear at the examination hearings.

How long each window runs and how to find it

Only the Regulation 19 and main modifications periods have a minimum set in the regulations. The others are at the council's discretion, and the council's statement of community involvement sets out what it has committed to do.

The local development scheme is the document that tells you when each stage is expected. Every authority must publish one and keep it up to date, and it gives the timetable for plan preparation by quarter. It slips, often by years, but it is the published position and it is where to look first.

Practical ways to know a window has opened. Sign up to the council's planning policy mailing list, which is the only reliable route. Check the planning policy pages rather than the planning applications pages, because the two are usually kept separately. Watch for the statutory notice in the local press. And ask your parish or town council, which is consulted directly and usually knows first.

Six weeks sounds generous. It is not, if the plan runs to three hundred pages with a dozen supporting evidence documents, and the window includes a holiday period. Start reading the day it opens.

What a duly made representation must contain

At Regulation 19 the test is not whether you like the plan. It is whether the plan is sound and legally compliant, and a representation that does not engage with those tests carries little weight.

The four soundness tests are set out in national policy. A plan should be positively prepared, justified, effective and consistent with national policy. Your representation should say which test the plan fails, on which policy or site allocation, why, and what change would make it sound.

That last element is the one most often missed. An inspector can only recommend modifications, so a representation that identifies a problem without proposing a change leaves the inspector with nothing to work with. Draft the alternative wording.

Other things a duly made representation needs. The policy or paragraph reference, so it can be logged against the right part of the plan. Your name and address. A statement of whether you wish to participate in the hearing sessions, because that right is lost if you do not ask for it at this stage. And it must arrive inside the window, because late representations do not have to be accepted.

Evidence helps. A representation that cites the council's own evidence base against itself is more effective than one asserting a view, and the evidence base is published alongside the plan.

Soundness and the examination that follows

The examination is conducted by an inspector appointed by the Planning Inspectorate, and it tests the plan rather than adjudicating between objectors.

Hearing sessions are organised around matters and issues set by the inspector, not around individual representations. If your point falls outside the matters list, it will be dealt with in writing. This surprises people who expected a day in court.

The inspector can recommend main modifications to make the plan sound. The council can accept them and adopt, or decline and withdraw the plan. Duty to cooperate failures are the one defect that cannot be cured by modification, which is why they feature so heavily in examination correspondence.

Once adopted, the plan becomes part of the development plan and decisions on applications must be made in accordance with it unless material considerations indicate otherwise. That is the statutory presumption, and it is why the consultation window matters more than most planning application consultations do. One policy in a plan affects every application for fifteen years.

Site promotion timing

For a landowner or promoter, the sequence is different and starts earlier.

The call for sites is the entry point and missing it is expensive, because a site not submitted is not assessed in the housing and economic land availability assessment, and a site not assessed is very difficult to get allocated later. Submit with a red line plan, a statement of availability, an indication of deliverability and any constraints work already done.

Then follow the site through the assessment. Where the council's assessment records a constraint incorrectly, correct it at Regulation 18 rather than waiting, because by Regulation 19 the allocation decisions have been made and you are arguing against a published position.

A site being promoted also benefits from the constraints work being done properly rather than asserted. Where the evidence base is honest about what the site needs, the allocation is more likely to survive examination, and the report types by category is a reasonable checklist of what a promotion pack eventually has to cover.

Tracking what happens after the window closes

The council must publish the representations received, usually as a schedule with its response to each. Read it. Your point will have been summarised by an officer, and the summary is what the inspector reads first.

If the summary misrepresents your point, say so in writing before the hearings. It is usually corrected without argument.

After adoption, the plan's policies apply to applications immediately. Supplementary planning documents follow, often on design, parking standards and developer contributions, and each has its own consultation. Those are shorter documents and easier to influence, and they carry real weight in decisions even though they cannot introduce new policy.

The wider reform picture, including the move towards national development management policies, is worth following because it changes what local plans will contain. The planning law updates timeline is one place to follow it.

Responding without a planning background

Three things make a lay representation land better.

Be specific about the policy. A representation headed "Policy H4, site allocation HA12" is logged, routed and read. One headed "objection to the local plan" is summarised into a general theme and loses its edge.

Be factual rather than emotive, and stick to material planning considerations. Loss of a private view and effect on property values are not material. Highway safety, flood risk, heritage impact, loss of open space, landscape character and the availability of infrastructure all are.

And say what should change. Even a single sentence proposing alternative wording gives the inspector something they can act on. A statement of community involvement prepared by an applicant works the same way, which is worth knowing if you later find yourself on the other side of the process.

This is general guidance rather than legal advice. Check the position with your local planning authority or a qualified professional before relying on it.

Frequently asked questions

Which local plan consultation stage matters most?

Regulation 19, the publication stage. It runs for a minimum of six weeks and representations made then go to the inspector examining the plan. Regulation 18 comments are read by council officers and shape the draft, but only Regulation 19 representations form part of the examination material.

How do I find out when a consultation opens?

Sign up to the council's planning policy mailing list, which is the only reliable route. Check the planning policy pages rather than the applications pages, since the two are kept separately. The local development scheme gives the expected timetable by quarter, and parish and town councils are consulted directly.

What are the soundness tests?

National policy sets four: the plan should be positively prepared, justified, effective and consistent with national policy. A Regulation 19 representation should name which test the plan fails, on which policy or allocation, explain why, and propose the change that would make it sound.

Will I get to speak at the examination?

Only if you ask at the Regulation 19 stage. A person who made a representation and requested to be heard has a right to appear at the hearing sessions. Sessions are organised around matters and issues set by the inspector rather than around individual representations, so some points are dealt with in writing.

What should a site promoter do and when?

Submit at the call for sites stage with a red line plan, a statement of availability and deliverability, and any constraints work done so far. A site not submitted is not assessed, and an unassessed site is very hard to get allocated later. Correct errors in the council's assessment at Regulation 18.

Sources and further reading

local planregulation 19consultationsoundnessexamination

This article is general guidance about the planning system in England and, where stated, the rest of the UK. It is not legal or professional advice. Check your local planning authority’s validation requirements and take professional advice for your specific site.

More in Seasonal Calendar

View all →
Seasonal Calendar7 min read

Archaeological evaluation and winter ground conditions

Saturated ground flattens the soil differences evaluation depends on. Here is what still works in winter, what does not, and how to programme around it.

Read article →
Seasonal Calendar7 min read

Air quality baseline monitoring and the twelve month year

Annual mean objectives need annual data. Here is how bias adjustment, annualisation and the council's published monitoring fit into a realistic programme.

Read article →
Seasonal Calendar7 min read

The annual five year housing land supply position

A published five year housing land supply is a snapshot at a base date, usually 1 April. Testing it means working site by site through the schedule rather than arguing about optimism in general.

Read article →
Seasonal Calendar7 min read

Housing Delivery Test publication and what it triggers

The Housing Delivery Test measurement triggers an action plan below 95 per cent, a 20 per cent supply buffer below 85 per cent and the presumption in favour of sustainable development below 75 per cent.

Read article →
Seasonal Calendar8 min read

Timing a submission around the planning committee cycle

The date that matters is the agenda publication deadline, and the officer report deadline before that. Work backwards from the committee meeting you want and the submission date falls out of it.

Read article →
Seasonal Calendar8 min read

CIL indexation and the figure that applies to your scheme

The rate in the charging schedule is not the rate you pay. Indexation runs from the year relevant to the permission, and the commencement notice is the deadline that costs the most to miss.

Read article →