Planning Process

Applications for development by statutory undertakers

7 min readBy PlanScope Editorial Team

Utilities do most of their work without a planning application. Which Part of the Order applies decides whether anyone gets consulted, and whether objection is possible at all.

Water companies, electricity distributors, railway operators and sewerage undertakers carry out most of their work without a planning application, because Schedule 2 to the General Permitted Development Order 2015 grants them rights that no ordinary developer has. For a site promoter trying to work out whether a neighbouring substation, pumping station or cable route will be consulted on, the first question is which Part of the Order applies, and the second is whether that Part attaches a prior approval step.

Where no prior approval applies, there is no application, no publicity and no third party involvement at all.

Rights granted to statutory undertakers

The term statutory undertaker is defined in section 262 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, and it covers persons authorised by an enactment to carry on a railway, tramway, road transport, water transport, canal, dock, harbour, pier or lighthouse undertaking. Gas, electricity, water and sewerage undertakers are treated as statutory undertakers for relevant planning purposes under their own legislation.

The rights are spread across several Parts of Schedule 2.

Part Subject Typical development
Part 8 Transport related development Railway operational land, docks, harbours, airports, lighthouses
Part 9 Development relating to roads Highway authority works, road improvements, cycle lanes
Part 10 Repairs to services Repairs to mains, pipes, cables and other apparatus
Part 13 Water and sewerage Water and sewerage undertakers' apparatus and buildings
Part 15 Power related development Electricity undertakers' lines, substations and apparatus
Part 16 Communications Electronic communications code operators' masts and cabinets

Each Part sets its own limits, usually by reference to building volume, height, ground area and distance from a highway or a dwelling. The limits are the whole protection: inside them there is no planning control beyond the general conditions, and outside them the undertaker needs permission like anyone else.

Operational land is a related idea worth knowing. Several Parts apply only to land used for the purposes of the undertaking, so a depot held as an investment rather than operationally may fall outside the right.

Where prior approval still applies

Prior approval is the exception rather than the rule in this area, and the clearest example is telecommunications. Part 16 requires an operator to apply to the authority for a determination as to whether prior approval is required for the siting and appearance of certain masts and apparatus, with a defined period for the authority to respond.

Several other Parts require advance notice without conferring the same control. Road and service works often require notification to the highway authority under separate street works legislation rather than under the planning Order, which produces the common confusion that a notice has been served but the council has no planning say.

Where a prior approval route exists, the authority's control is limited to the matters the Order names, usually siting and appearance. It cannot refuse the principle. That distinction matters when a parish council writes in objecting to the need for a mast rather than to its position.

Development outside the rights

Three routes take over when the permitted development limits are exceeded.

A full planning application is the normal one. Statutory undertakers apply like any other applicant, and the development plan and material considerations apply, though the operational need for the facility is usually weighty. Expect a Planning Statement that leads on the statutory duty to supply, the technical constraints on siting and the alternatives considered.

Nationally significant infrastructure takes a different path. Under the Planning Act 2008, projects above defined thresholds, including large generating stations, electricity lines above stated voltages and some water and waste water projects, are consented by a development consent order after examination by the Planning Inspectorate. That process replaces planning permission and a long list of other consents.

Specialist regimes cover the rest. Overhead electricity lines are consented under section 37 of the Electricity Act 1989, railway works can use an order under the Transport and Works Act 1992, and development authorised by a government department can carry deemed planning permission under section 90 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990.

Consultation with the local authority

Where a full application is made, the authority consults in the ordinary way and neighbours receive notice. Where the undertaker relies on permitted development, no consultation duty arises under the planning Order, though many utilities consult voluntarily on larger schemes because it reduces objections later.

Statutory consultee duties run the other way too. Water and sewerage undertakers, National Highways and Network Rail are themselves consulted on applications affecting their apparatus or network, and their responses sit on the case file. If you are trying to understand what a utility has said about your scheme, the method for getting consultee responses and the officer's case file applies directly.

Ownership is a recurring complication. Undertakers often hold easements rather than freeholds, so an applicant building near apparatus may need to serve notice on the undertaker as a person with an interest, which is where ownership certificates A to D become relevant.

Land acquisition and compulsory powers

Most statutory undertakers hold compulsory purchase powers under their own enactments, and some can acquire rights such as easements rather than land. Those powers are separate from planning permission, and an undertaker can hold one without the other.

For a landowner, the practical effect is that refusing access rarely stops a scheme and often changes the terms. Negotiated agreements normally produce better compensation and better reinstatement conditions than a compulsory process, and they can be made conditional on the route or the position of apparatus.

Where a development consent order is sought, compulsory acquisition powers can be included in the order itself, and affected landowners become interested parties in the examination.

Objecting to undertaker development

Be realistic about the available routes, because the answer depends entirely on which consent regime applies.

  1. Where the work is permitted development with no prior approval step, there is nothing to object to in planning terms. The useful route is direct engagement with the undertaker's scheme team, and in some cases the sector regulator.
  2. Where a prior approval route exists, write to the authority within the period, and address only the matters the authority controls, usually siting and appearance.
  3. Where a full application is made, object as you would to any application, on material planning considerations.
  4. Where a development consent order is sought, register as an interested party with the Planning Inspectorate during the relevant period. Missing that window substantially reduces your involvement.
  5. Where you believe the right does not apply, say why in writing to the local planning authority and ask it to investigate. The authority can serve a planning contravention notice and, where the right does not apply, take enforcement action.

Crown development follows its own rules again, and the parallel is set out in Crown land applications and the urgent Crown route.

Checking whether a right applies

Work through it in order rather than guessing from the body's name.

First, confirm the body's statutory status for the particular undertaking. A company that supplies water in one area may not be an undertaker for an unrelated activity elsewhere.

Second, identify the Part and Class relied on, and read the limitations in full, including the interpretation paragraph at the end of the Part, which often carries the definitions that decide the point.

Third, check whether the land is operational land for the undertaking, where the Class requires it.

Fourth, check the geographical restrictions. Several Classes are restricted or disapplied on article 2(3) land, which covers conservation areas, National Parks, the Broads, National Landscapes and World Heritage Sites, and an Article 4 direction can remove a right entirely.

Fifth, check environmental impact assessment. Permitted development rights do not apply to development requiring an environmental impact assessment, so screening comes first where the project is of a type and scale that may qualify.

Then write the conclusion down with the Class reference. A note that says which Class, which limits and which date it was checked is worth far more in a year's time than a recollection that someone thought it was permitted.

This is general guidance, not legal advice. Check the position with your local planning authority or a qualified professional before relying on it, and read the current text of the relevant Part.

If your own scheme sits next to utility apparatus, enter the site postcode on PlanScope to see which supporting documents it is likely to need. PlanScope provides AI-assisted draft reports for planning applications. Reports should be reviewed before submission. We do not guarantee planning approval.

Frequently asked questions

Who counts as a statutory undertaker?

Section 262 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 defines the term to include persons authorised by enactment to carry on railway, tramway, road transport, water transport, canal, dock, harbour, pier or lighthouse undertakings. Gas, electricity, water and sewerage undertakers are treated as statutory undertakers for relevant planning purposes under their own legislation.

Do water companies need planning permission for a pumping station?

Often not. Part 13 of Schedule 2 to the General Permitted Development Order 2015 grants water and sewerage undertakers rights for apparatus and buildings within stated limits on volume, height and ground area. A structure outside those limits needs a planning application, and large waste water projects may instead need a development consent order.

Can I object to permitted development by a utility?

Not in planning terms, where no prior approval step applies. There is no application, so there is nothing for the council to decide. The practical routes are direct engagement with the undertaker's project team, the sector regulator, or asking the local planning authority to investigate whether the right actually applies to the work.

What is a development consent order?

It is the consent for nationally significant infrastructure under the Planning Act 2008, granted after examination by the Planning Inspectorate. It replaces planning permission and many other consents, and can include compulsory acquisition powers. Affected parties must register as interested parties within the published period to take part in the examination.

Does an undertaker's right apply on any land it owns?

Not always. Several Classes apply only to operational land, meaning land used for the purposes of the undertaking, so an investment holding or a surplus depot may fall outside the right. Geographical restrictions also apply on conservation areas, National Parks, National Landscapes and World Heritage Sites, and an Article 4 direction can remove a right.

Sources and further reading

statutory undertakerspermitted developmentutilitiesinfrastructuregpdoplanning process

This article is general guidance about the planning system in England and, where stated, the rest of the UK. It is not legal or professional advice. Check your local planning authority’s validation requirements and take professional advice for your specific site.

More in Planning Process

View all →
Planning Process7 min read

Varying a permission for development already begun

Section 73B of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 allows a permission to be varied where the effect is not substantially different, including for works already carried out. How the test works, and how to choose between the routes.

Read article →
Planning Process7 min read

Planning history searches before you buy a site

The standard search misses more planning risk than it finds. Here is what to check on the register, and what to ask before you exchange.

Read article →
Planning Process6 min read

Accompanied and unaccompanied inspector site visits

The inspector will visit your site before deciding the appeal. Knowing whether it is accompanied, and what you are allowed to say, changes how you prepare.

Read article →
Planning Process6 min read

The appeal questionnaire and what the council must supply

The council's appeal questionnaire arrives within days of the start date and carries the officer report, policy extracts and consultation responses. Read it before you draft a word.

Read article →
Planning Process6 min read

What stops the eight week clock on an application

The determination period runs from the day after a valid application is received. Consultee silence and amended drawings do not pause it; only a written extension does.

Read article →
Planning Process7 min read

Writing a consultation response an officer can use

Objections that cite a policy number and show evidence get addressed in the officer's report. Objections that express concern get summarised in a sentence.

Read article →