Costs, Fees and Budgeting

Full application fees by floorspace and site area

6 min readBy PlanScope Editorial Team

Full planning application fees in England are charged by category: per dwelling, per 75 m2 of gross floor space created, or per 0.1 hectare of site area. Measure the right thing.

The fee for a full planning application in England is set by category, and the category is chosen by what the development physically is. Houses are charged per dwelling. Most other buildings are charged on the gross floor space created, in 75 m² steps. Plant, machinery, mineral working and waste are charged on site area in 0.1 hectare steps. Getting the wrong category, or measuring the wrong thing, is one of the commonest reasons an application sits unregistered while the eight or thirteen week clock has not started.

How the fee schedule is built

All of it comes from Schedule 1 to the Town and Country Planning (Fees for Applications, Deemed Applications, Requests and Site Visits) (England) Regulations 2012, as amended. The schedule is a list of numbered categories, each with its own unit of measurement and its own band structure. The Planning Practice Guidance chapter on fees explains the structure and links to the current figures.

Do not work from a printed figure. Fees were uplifted in December 2023 and are now indexed annually, with the revised amounts taking effect on 1 April each year. Anything written down in a fee schedule more than a year old is wrong. Check the current schedule before you budget, and check it again before you submit if the submission straddles April.

Fee measured on Categories it applies to
Number of dwellings Erection of dwellinghouses, and change of use to one or more dwellings
Gross floor space created, per 75 m² Erection of buildings other than dwellings, agricultural buildings and glasshouses
Gross floor space created, banded Agricultural buildings and glasshouses
Site area, per 0.1 hectare Erection of plant or machinery, mineral working, waste development, and outline applications
Flat fee Householder development, changes of use other than to dwellings, car parks and service roads for an existing use, advertisements

Measuring the gross floor space created

Gross floor space for fee purposes is measured externally and includes every storey, so external wall thickness, plant rooms, mezzanines and any floor inserted into an existing volume all count. The measurement is of the floor space to be created by the development, which is not the same thing as the net increase in floor space on the site.

That distinction catches people out on demolish-and-rebuild schemes. Where a building is demolished and a replacement erected, councils charge on the full floor area of the new building, because that is what the development creates. The same logic means a change of use that creates no new floor space falls into the flat-fee band rather than the per-75 m² scale, even if the internal works are extensive.

The per-75 m² scale runs from a lower threshold up to a fixed area, above which a base amount applies plus a further amount for each additional 75 m² or part of 75 m². Note the words "or part of", because 76 m² attracts two units, not one and a fraction. Round the measurement up honestly rather than shaving a schedule to land under a step.

Site area and the hectare steps

Site area means the area of the application site, which is the land inside the red line on the location plan. That makes the red line a financial decision as well as a planning one on any area-charged category.

Two habits inflate the figure without helping the application. The first is drawing the red line around the whole ownership when only part is being developed, which is rarely necessary and sometimes actively harmful, because it puts land into the description of development that nobody intends to touch. The second is including an access route in red when it should be blue. Land in the applicant's ownership that is not part of the development belongs in blue, and blue land does not count towards site area for fee purposes.

Area-charged categories run in 0.1 hectare units, again with "or part of" wording, so a 2.13 hectare site is charged on 22 units. Above a stated area the scale changes to a base amount plus an additional amount for each further 0.1 hectare, and a maximum applies.

Schemes that fall into more than one category

A mixed development, say 40 flats with a ground-floor commercial unit and a substation, touches three categories at once. The regulations deal with this, and different authorities have read the combination rules differently over the years, which is why the same scheme can attract two different quotes from two validation teams.

The practical answer is to calculate each element separately, set out the arithmetic in writing, and ask the authority to confirm the total before you submit. A fee query answered by email in advance costs nothing. An underpayment discovered three weeks later means the application was never validly made, so the determination period has not begun and any extension of time you agreed is meaningless.

The caps, and when they matter

Every large category has a maximum fee. Once a scheme passes the cap, further floor space or further hectares add nothing to the application fee, which changes the marginal economics of phasing. A single application for the whole site can attract a lower total fee than three applications for thirds of it, even before you count the duplicated consultant time and the three sets of validation risk.

Set against that, a single large application locks the whole scheme into one determination period and one appeal if it goes wrong. Fees are rarely the deciding factor. But they are worth modelling, alongside the cost of dealing with retrospective development if any part of the site has already been altered, and the position on a fee refund where the council fails to determine in time.

Where measurement disputes actually arise

Four arguments come up again and again. Whether a covered but unenclosed area, such as a canopy over a loading bay, is floor space. Whether an existing mezzanine that is being replaced counts as created. Whether a private drive within the site is part of the site area. And whether a building described as agricultural qualifies for the agricultural bands, which turns on the use rather than the appearance.

The last one is worth care. The agricultural categories apply to buildings for agriculture as the legislation understands it, so an equestrian building, a farm shop or a general purpose store let to a third party is charged under the ordinary buildings category. Describing a building as agricultural to reach a lower band, when the intended use is not agriculture, is a validation problem and a later enforcement problem.

Putting the figures in the covering letter

Write the fee calculation into the covering letter, not just into the Planning Portal form. Three lines is enough: the category relied on, the measured quantity with its unit, and the arithmetic. State the drawing number that the measurement came from. Where you have had the figure confirmed by the authority, say who confirmed it and when.

That short paragraph does two jobs. It stops a validation officer recalculating from scratch and reaching a different answer, and it gives you a documented position if the figure is challenged after registration. A Planning Statement is the right place to carry the same figures where the scheme is large enough to need one.

This is general guidance, not legal advice. Fee amounts are indexed and change, so check the current schedule with your local planning authority or a qualified professional before relying on any figure. PlanScope provides AI-assisted draft reports for planning applications. Reports should be reviewed before submission. We do not guarantee planning approval.

For what the drafting side costs, see PlanScope pricing: one free report, £50 per report, or Professional for unlimited reports.

Frequently asked questions

Is the fee based on new floor space or the net increase?

It is charged on the gross floor space to be created by the development, measured externally across all storeys. On a demolish-and-rebuild scheme that means the full area of the replacement building, not the difference between old and new. A change of use creating no floor space falls into the flat-fee band instead.

Does land shown in blue count towards site area for the fee?

No. Site area for fee purposes is the land inside the red line on the location plan. Land in the applicant's ownership that is not part of the development is shown in blue and is excluded. Drawing the red line around a whole ownership inflates the fee and widens the description of development unnecessarily.

What happens if the fee is underpaid?

The application is not validly made, so it is not registered and the eight or thirteen week determination period does not begin. Any agreed extension of time runs from a date that never arrived. Confirm the calculation with the validation team in writing before submitting, particularly on schemes that touch more than one fee category.

Are planning fees the same every year?

No. Fees were uplifted in December 2023 and are now indexed annually, with revised amounts taking effect on 1 April. Any printed schedule older than a year is out of date. Check the current figures on the government fees guidance, and check again if your submission date straddles the start of April.

Does a maximum fee apply to large applications?

Yes. The larger categories have a stated maximum, so once a scheme passes the cap additional floor space or additional hectares add nothing to the fee. That can make the fee on one application for a whole site lower than the total on several applications for parts of it, though programme and appeal risk usually matter more.

Which buildings qualify for the agricultural fee bands?

Only buildings for agriculture as the legislation defines it. An equestrian building, a farm shop, or a general purpose store let to a third party is charged under the ordinary buildings category on the per 75 m2 scale. Labelling a building agricultural to reach a lower band creates both a validation and an enforcement problem.

Sources and further reading

planning feesapplication costsfloorspacesite areavalidationmajor development

This article is general guidance about the planning system in England and, where stated, the rest of the UK. It is not legal or professional advice. Check your local planning authority’s validation requirements and take professional advice for your specific site.

More in Costs, Fees and Budgeting

View all →
Costs, Fees and Budgeting8 min read

Costing a stopping up order for a highway or footpath

Public rights do not lapse through disuse and planning permission does not override them. This covers the section 247 and 257 routes, what objectors actually argue about, and how to keep the order off the critical path.

Read article →
Costs, Fees and Budgeting7 min read

Costing an affordable housing review mechanism

Early and late stage review mechanisms are decided by their definitions, not their headline percentages. This covers the inputs that move the answer, who pays for the review and the caps to secure before signing.

Read article →
Costs, Fees and Budgeting7 min read

Costing an employment land assessment for an allocated site

On an allocated employment site the fee sits in evidence gathering, not analysis. This covers the marketing records councils expect, the suitability tests that decide it, and how to sequence the work.

Read article →
Costs, Fees and Budgeting7 min read

Costing an odour assessment for a kitchen or waste use

The fee for an odour assessment depends on whether the council accepts a qualitative risk based appraisal or expects dispersion modelling. Here is what sits behind each, and how to scope the work before you commission it.

Read article →
Costs, Fees and Budgeting6 min read

Costing a telecommunications compliance declaration for a mast

An ICNIRP declaration is produced by the operator's own radio engineers and closes the health issue. Siting and appearance are the only matters the council can decide on.

Read article →
Costs, Fees and Budgeting6 min read

Costing an equalities impact assessment for a public applicant

The public sector equality duty is continuing, so an equalities impact assessment has to be revisited at every material change. Budgeting for one document is the common mistake.

Read article →