Powered two-wheeler parking and where it belongs
Powered two-wheeler provision has its own ratio, bay type and siting expectations in adopted parking standards, and it is the line most often left off a layout.
Powered two-wheeler parking sits in adopted parking standards as its own line, separate from car spaces and separate from cycle parking, and it is the line most often missing from a submitted layout. A highways officer who spots the omission will ask for a revised plan, which costs a fortnight on a scheme that was otherwise ready to determine. Check the adopted standard for motorcycle parking before you set out the car park, because retrofitting bays after the layout is fixed usually means losing a car space or a planter.
The provision is small. The consequences of leaving it out are administrative rather than technical, and they are entirely avoidable.
Why standards treat them separately
A motorcycle or scooter is not a car and not a bicycle, and it fails in a space designed for either.
In a car bay it occupies a fraction of the area and cannot be secured to anything, so it is vulnerable to theft and to being knocked over. In a cycle store it brings fuel, hot exhaust components and, increasingly, lithium batteries into an enclosure designed for neither, which creates a fire risk the building's fire strategy has not assessed. Cycle stands are also the wrong geometry: a Sheffield stand gives a motorcycle nothing useful to lock to at frame height.
So adopted standards give powered two-wheelers their own ratio, their own bay type and their own location expectations. Authorities in areas with high scooter use tend to set higher ratios, and city centre standards often set a minimum regardless of scheme size.
Typical provision in adopted policy
Ratios are expressed either as a proportion of the car parking provision or as a rate per dwelling or per unit of floorspace. Both forms appear in adopted plans, and some authorities set a minimum number for any development above a stated size.
Two practical points follow. A scheme with no car parking at all may still attract a powered two-wheeler requirement, because the rate is sometimes tied to floorspace rather than to car spaces. And where the standard is expressed as a percentage of car provision, reducing car parking to satisfy a sustainable transport policy can reduce the motorcycle requirement to zero, which some authorities regard as an unintended outcome and resist.
Read the standard itself rather than the summary table in the local plan, because the detail usually sits in a parking standards supplementary planning document. Where the adopted standard is silent, provide something anyway on any scheme with a car park, and say in the Transport Statement why the quantum was chosen.
Bay dimensions and anchor points
A bay has to accommodate the machine, allow it to be wheeled in and out, and give something to secure it to.
The machine cannot be pushed sideways, so the bay needs a clear approach from the aisle rather than a slot between two obstructions. Parking is normally perpendicular to a wall or a kerb, with the front wheel towards the obstruction. A dropped kerb or a level threshold is needed where the bay is on a raised area, since a rider cannot lift a machine over a 125mm upstand.
Security is the part designers skip. Provide a ground anchor or a substantial hoop set into the slab for each bay, rated for that purpose, and position it so a chain reaches the frame rather than only the wheel. Riders who cannot secure a machine will park it somewhere else, which defeats the provision.
Surfacing should be a firm, level, non-slip finish. Gravel, grass reinforcement and block paving with wide joints all cause machines on side stands to sink or slip, which is why bays on permeable surfaces need a bound or rigid finish locally.
Location, security and lighting
Put the bays where a rider can see them from the approach and where other people can see the bays.
The useful positions are near the pedestrian entrance, within view of an occupied window or a reception, under the building line or a canopy where cover is available, and close to the vehicular entrance so a rider is not weaving through the whole car park. The positions that fail are the far corner, behind a bin store, and a dead end with no natural surveillance.
Lighting should cover the bays to the same standard as the pedestrian routes, without creating glare or spill into windows. Where a lighting scheme is being prepared for the site, include the motorcycle bays in it rather than treating them as part of the general car park wash. Bin stores have exactly the same siting logic, and bin storage and collection points are worth coordinating with the two-wheeler bays since both want a position near the entrance.
Covered provision is worth arguing for on residential schemes. A rider with covered, anchored parking is far more likely to use the machine instead of a car.
Interaction with cycle and car parking
Keep the three types physically separate and show them separately on the drawing.
Charging is where the separation now breaks down. Electric motorcycles and scooters need a supply, and the safe place to charge a lithium battery is not a communal cycle store or a basement without detection and ventilation. Coordinate the supply with the scheme's electric vehicle charging provision so the cable route reaches the two-wheeler bays, and take advice on where charging is acceptable within the fire strategy.
Accessible parking is a separate requirement again and should never be reduced to accommodate motorcycle bays. Where the car park is tight, the order of priority is accessible bays first, then the standard car provision, then powered two-wheelers, and accessible and blue badge parking has its own dimensional rules that cannot be compromised.
Delivery riders and commercial premises
For a hot food takeaway, a dark kitchen, a convenience store with a delivery operation or a pharmacy, powered two-wheeler parking stops being a standards question and becomes a planning issue in its own right.
Riders congregate. They arrive and leave at concentrated times, they idle engines, they stand in groups on the pavement, and they park on double yellow lines if there is nowhere else. Objections to takeaway applications are frequently about riders rather than about odour or noise from the kitchen.
Provide dedicated rider parking on site where the site can take it, marked and clearly for that use. Where it cannot, be explicit in the application about how riders will be managed, including a delivery management plan and a rider waiting area inside the premises. Councils increasingly impose conditions requiring both, and a scheme that offers them before being asked is in a better position at committee.
Showing provision on the drawings
- Mark each bay on the proposed site plan with its dimensions, and use a motorcycle symbol rather than a plain rectangle.
- Add a parking schedule to the drawing listing car, accessible, cycle and powered two-wheeler provision against the adopted standard.
- Show the anchor points and their type, and the surface finish where it differs locally.
- Show the lighting coverage over the bays on the external lighting layout.
- State the adopted policy reference and the calculation in the transport document.
- Where charging is provided, show the supply route and the point locations.
An illustrative example: a 48 flat scheme with 20 car spaces in a town centre, where the adopted standard sets powered two-wheeler provision as a proportion of car parking with a minimum of two bays. The layout places three bays beside the pedestrian entrance, under the first floor overhang, with galvanised ground anchors, a bound resin surface and a lighting column already serving the entrance path. The parking schedule on the drawing shows all four categories. No revision is requested.
PlanScope drafts a Transport Statement or a fuller Transport Assessment from your site details and answers, structured to UK planning policy, with the parking calculation flagged where the adopted standard has to be confirmed locally. Councils usually expect transport evidence from a suitably qualified author, so treat the draft as a starting point and send it for professional review.
This is general guidance, not legal advice; check the adopted parking standard with your local planning authority before relying on it. PlanScope provides AI-assisted draft reports for planning applications. Reports should be reviewed before submission. We do not guarantee planning approval.
Frequently asked questions
Why can a motorcycle not just use a car space or a cycle store?
In a car bay it occupies a fraction of the area with nothing to secure it to, so it is easily stolen or knocked over. In a cycle store it introduces fuel, hot exhaust parts and lithium batteries into an enclosure the fire strategy has not assessed, and cycle stands give a motorcycle nothing useful to lock to at frame height.
Does a car free scheme still need motorcycle parking?
It can. Where the adopted standard expresses provision as a rate per dwelling or per unit of floorspace, the requirement survives the removal of car parking entirely. Where it is expressed as a proportion of car provision, cutting car spaces cuts the motorcycle requirement too, which some authorities regard as unintended and resist.
What makes a bay usable in practice?
A clear approach from the aisle, because a machine cannot be pushed sideways. A level or dropped threshold rather than a full kerb upstand. A firm, bound, non-slip surface so side stands do not sink. And a ground anchor or substantial hoop positioned so a chain reaches the frame rather than only a wheel.
Where should the bays go?
Near the pedestrian entrance, in view of an occupied window or reception, under a canopy or building overhang where cover exists, and close to the vehicular entrance. Avoid the far corner, the space behind a bin store and any dead end without natural surveillance, since riders will simply park elsewhere.
How should delivery rider parking be handled?
Treat it as a planning issue rather than a standards calculation. Provide marked rider parking on site where the site can take it, and where it cannot, submit a delivery management plan and show an internal waiting area. Objections to takeaway applications are frequently about rider behaviour rather than about cooking odour.
Sources and further reading
This article is general guidance about the planning system in England and, where stated, the rest of the UK. It is not legal or professional advice. Check your local planning authority’s validation requirements and take professional advice for your specific site.