Which Reports Do I Need

Reports needed for a church hall replacement

7 min readBy PlanScope Editorial Team

Rebuilding a church hall means answering three questions at once: the community facility replacement test, the setting of the adjoining listed church, and what lies under a churchyard.

Replacing a church hall on its existing site looks like the simplest kind of application. It is not, because the church hall replacement documents have to answer three questions at once: whether the community facility policy allows the loss of the old building, what the new building does to the setting of the listed church beside it, and what is in the ground.

The third one decides the programme. A churchyard is a burial ground, and burial grounds are archaeology.

Community facility policy and the replacement test

Most local plans protect community facilities and allow their loss only where a replacement of equivalent or better quality and capacity is provided, or where it is shown the facility is no longer needed. A like-for-like replacement on the same site normally satisfies that policy comfortably, provided the application sets out the comparison.

Put the comparison in a table in the planning statement: floor area of the old hall against the new, main hall capacity, number of meeting rooms, kitchen provision, accessible toilets, storage, and hours of availability. Officers write the policy paragraph of their report straight out of that table.

Use classes matter here too. A hall used mainly by the local community falls within Class F2, while a building used for public worship or religious instruction sits in Class F1. If the replacement is intended for both, say so and apply for the mixed use, because a condition limiting it to one will cause problems in five years.

The setting of the adjoining listed church

A new building next to a listed church affects its setting, which engages the duty under section 66 of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 to have special regard to preserving the building and its setting. That duty applies whether or not the hall itself is listed.

A heritage statement has to do three things. Describe what makes the church special, using the list entry and the historic environment record. Explain how the church is currently experienced, including the approach from the lychgate, views from the road and the relationship to the churchyard. Then assess the effect of the new hall on those things, describe the level of harm, and justify it against the public benefits of the replacement.

Design responses that work on these sites are consistent: keep the ridge below the eaves of the church, pull the building back from principal views, use a simple plan form, and choose materials that sit quietly rather than imitating the church. A low, well-detailed building in natural materials usually beats a historicist one.

One procedural point catches parishes out. Church of England buildings in use for worship benefit from the ecclesiastical exemption from listed building consent, but that exemption has never covered planning permission. A new hall in a churchyard needs planning permission in the normal way, and separately needs a faculty from the diocesan chancellor. Those are two processes on two timetables.

Archaeology and burials in a churchyard

Assume burials unless the evidence says otherwise. Even where the churchyard appears unused in living memory, interments may continue under the surface across the whole enclosure, and medieval churchyards are often stratified several layers deep.

The first document is an archaeological desk-based assessment, drawing on the historic environment record, historic maps, burial registers and any previous investigation nearby. The county archaeologist advising the authority will read it and recommend either a condition requiring a written scheme of investigation, or pre-determination evaluation where the significance is high.

Human remains add a separate consent layer. Where remains have to be disturbed, consecrated ground is dealt with under the faculty jurisdiction and unconsecrated ground under the burial legislation administered by central government. Either route requires a method for exhumation, recording and reinterment, with screening of the working area and an archaeologist present.

Two design moves reduce the problem substantially. Keeping the new footprint within the footprint of the old hall avoids fresh ground disturbance. And a raft or piled foundation that minimises excavation depth can take a scheme out of the burial horizon altogether, which is worth engineering advice early rather than late.

Trees on the churchyard boundary

Churchyards hold old trees, and yews in particular can predate the church. Trees in a conservation area are protected by the requirement to notify the authority six weeks before works, and individual trees may carry a tree preservation order.

A tree survey to the current British Standard for trees in relation to design, demolition and construction gives the information the authority needs: the position and condition of each tree, its root protection area plotted on the layout, and the construction exclusion zone. Where the new building encroaches on a root protection area, an arboricultural impact assessment and method statement set out how the roots are protected, usually through no-dig construction.

Veteran trees get particular weight in national policy, and the loss of one is hard to justify for a building that could have been positioned two metres further away. Survey before you draw.

Access, parking and shared use

Church halls serve groups with specific access needs, and the accessibility case is part of the planning argument rather than only a building regulations matter.

Show a level or gently ramped approach from the car park and from the street, an accessible WC, a drop-off point close to the entrance, and a route that works in the dark in winter. Lighting should be specified at a level that lets people see the path without spilling into neighbouring gardens or the churchyard's bat corridors.

Parking is usually the objection. Halls generate concentrated arrivals and departures at session start and finish times, and neighbours judge the application on a Saturday morning rather than a Tuesday. A short transport statement setting out the hire schedule, expected attendance per session, available on-site spaces and the on-street situation at those times answers the point properly. Where parking is shared with the church, say how Sunday services and hall bookings are coordinated.

Drainage on a tight site

A new roof on the same footprint does not increase run-off much, but a larger building, a new car park or a paved terrace does, and the authority's drainage team will ask for the calculation.

A drainage strategy needs to establish the existing discharge arrangement, which on an old hall is often an unrecorded soakaway or a connection into a combined sewer, and then show the proposed arrangement with attenuation sized for the current rainfall and climate change allowances. Those allowances are updated periodically, so take the figures from the published allowances rather than from an older report.

Soakaway design in a churchyard raises an obvious problem, since infiltration testing means digging holes in a burial ground. Discuss the testing locations with the archaeologist before the ground investigation is commissioned. Scoping an evidence base in the right order is the same discipline that applies to a nine dwelling greenfield scheme.

Keeping the hall running during construction

Groups that use the hall weekly will not wait a year, and losing them is the real risk to the project.

Temporary accommodation is usually a portable building on part of the site or in the car park. A temporary structure needed in connection with building operations on the land is generally permitted development, but a portable building used for community activities is a different thing, so check whether a temporary permission is needed and apply for it with the main scheme rather than afterwards.

A construction management plan covering the hoarding line, delivery times, parking for contractors, protection of monuments and headstones, dust control and the complaints contact belongs with the application. Where a demolition and rebuild is proposed, a pre-redevelopment audit identifies materials worth reclaiming, including stone, slate and joinery that may be reusable in the new building. Environmental constraints shape the pack in the same way they do for an industrial extension inside an air quality management area.

Securing community use for the long term

Authorities granting permission to replace a community building usually want the community use secured, and there are two mechanisms.

A condition restricting the use of the building to Class F2 purposes, or to community use as defined in the condition, is the lighter option. A community use agreement under section 106 goes further, setting out hours of availability to the public, a pricing framework and a management regime, and it is what authorities ask for where grant funding or a sports facility is involved.

Neither is a reason to be anxious. Both reflect what the parish intends to do anyway, and an agreed condition is better than an argument at committee.

PlanScope covers the documents a replacement hall needs across its 66 report types, including the planning statement, heritage statement, archaeological desk-based assessment and drainage strategy. For specialist technical reports, qualified professional input may be required.

Enter your postcode on PlanScope to see which reports your site is likely to need.

PlanScope provides AI-assisted draft reports for planning applications. Reports should be reviewed before submission. We do not guarantee planning approval. This is general guidance, not legal advice; check the position with your local planning authority or a qualified professional before relying on it.

Frequently asked questions

Does the ecclesiastical exemption cover a new church hall?

No. The exemption applies to listed building consent for buildings in use for worship, and it has never covered planning permission. A new hall in a churchyard needs planning permission in the normal way and, for a Church of England site, separately needs a faculty from the diocesan chancellor. The two run on different timetables.

Will a churchyard site need archaeological work?

Almost always. Assume burials across the whole enclosure unless evidence shows otherwise, since medieval churchyards are often stratified several layers deep. Expect a desk-based assessment first, then either a condition requiring a written scheme of investigation or pre-determination evaluation where the archaeological interest is high.

What consent is needed to disturb human remains?

Consecrated ground is dealt with under the faculty jurisdiction and unconsecrated ground under the burial legislation administered by central government. Either route requires an agreed method for exhumation, recording and reinterment, with the working area screened and an archaeologist present during the works.

Which use class does a church hall fall into?

A hall used mainly by the local community falls within Class F2, while a building used for public worship or religious instruction sits in Class F1. Where the replacement serves both purposes, apply for the mixed use, because a condition limiting it to one class creates problems when the pattern of use changes.

How can community use be secured on a replacement hall?

Either by a condition restricting use to Class F2 or to community use as defined, or by a community use agreement under section 106 setting out public availability hours, pricing and management. Authorities tend to ask for the agreement where grant funding or a sports facility is involved.

Sources and further reading

community facilitieschurch hallarchaeologyheritage settingwhich reports

This article is general guidance about the planning system in England and, where stated, the rest of the UK. It is not legal or professional advice. Check your local planning authority’s validation requirements and take professional advice for your specific site.

More in Which Reports Do I Need

View all →
Which Reports Do I Need7 min read

Reports for a rooftop pool on a flat conversion

A rooftop pool on a converted block turns on three pieces of evidence: the weight of water on the existing structure, the noise of wet plant, and what the enclosure does to the roofline.

Read article →
Which Reports Do I Need7 min read

Reports for a sand and gravel extension of six hectares

A six hectare gravel extension is decided by the mineral planning authority, needs an EIA screening opinion, and turns on hydrogeology and restoration rather than on blasting.

Read article →
Which Reports Do I Need6 min read

Reports for a traveller site with four pitches

A four pitch traveller site is a minor application with a major policy test. Need evidence, pitch separation and flood vulnerability decide most of these cases.

Read article →
Which Reports Do I Need7 min read

Reports for a micro hydro scheme on a weir

Micro hydro at a weir needs planning permission plus abstraction, impoundment and flood risk permits. The fish pass is often the costliest item, and it has to be settled before the drawings.

Read article →
Which Reports Do I Need7 min read

Reports for a student accommodation scheme of 200 beds

A 200 bed student scheme is a major application with two documents that have no equivalent on a standard residential pack: the institutional need case and the student management plan.

Read article →
Which Reports Do I Need7 min read

Consents for a scaffold gantry over the public highway

Hoardings and scaffolds sit inside Part 4 permitted development, but the licences that control them come from the highway authority under the Highways Act 1980, and hoarding graphics are a separate advertisement consent.

Read article →