Which reports padel or tennis courts need

A padel court is a small building with a noise problem and a lighting problem attached, and councils treat it accordingly. The document set for two courts behind a village club is short, but it has to answer four questions properly: what the land is in planning terms, how loud the game is at the nearest window, where the light goes, and where the water goes.

Tennis courts raise the same questions with different answers. Padel is the harder case because the court is enclosed, the ball strike is sharp, and play carries on into the evening under lights.

Whether the land counts as a playing field

Start here, because it changes who has to be consulted. Where development affects land used as a playing field, Sport England is a statutory consultee under the Development Management Procedure Order 2015, and its response carries real weight with case officers.

The definition turns on the site rather than on the individual court. Land that includes at least one playing pitch, and land used as a playing field within the last five years that remains undeveloped, can fall within the consultation requirement even where the courts themselves sit on a corner of it.

If the proposal takes a slice of grass pitch to build courts, expect the consultation to focus on whether the replacement provision is equivalent or better in quantity, quality and accessibility, and whether the remaining pitch layout still works. Deal with that in the application rather than waiting for the objection.

Where the land is allocated as open space in the local plan, or designated as Local Green Space, a further policy test applies and the case becomes considerably harder.

Noise from padel, and why it is different

Padel produces two sounds that carry: the strike of a solid racket on a pressurised ball, and players calling to each other across a small enclosed court. Both are short, sharp events. Neither is well described by an average level over an afternoon.

There is no British Standard written for padel. Assessments in practice combine a BS 4142:2014+A1:2019 analysis, with character corrections for the impulsive nature of the ball strike, and an event-based analysis of maximum levels at the nearest noise-sensitive facade. Presenting only one of the two invites a request for the other.

The variables that actually change the answer are the distance to the nearest dwelling, the orientation of the courts, the presence and construction of any acoustic fence or barrier, the surface and the court structure itself, and the hours of play. Barrier design matters more than most applicants expect, since a fence that is acoustically transparent does nothing whatever it looks like.

Set out the proposed hours as part of the Noise Impact Assessment rather than leaving them to the officer, and model the evening condition, because that is when the background is low and the courts are busy.

Floodlighting design and light spill

Lighting is assessed against the Institution of Lighting Professionals guidance on obtrusive light, which sets limits by environmental zone, from the darkest rural zone to a bright city centre. The assessment needs to state which zone applies and why, because a club on the edge of a village is usually in a stricter zone than the applicant assumes.

The figures that get tested are vertical illuminance at nearby windows, the luminous intensity of the luminaires in the direction of receptors, the upward light ratio, and compliance before and after any curfew hour.

Modern column-mounted LED floodlights with sharp cut-off optics and correct aiming outperform older designs by a wide margin, and a Lighting Assessment that includes an isolux plot, the luminaire schedule and the aiming diagram is far more persuasive than one that quotes a specification alone. Where the site is near bat roosts or a commuting route, the ecological effect of the lighting is a separate question and needs the ecologist's input on spectrum, timing and spill.

Hours of use and how they are conditioned

Councils condition hours on courts almost every time. The realistic ask is different on weekdays and at weekends, and it is worth proposing a schedule rather than accepting a blanket one.

A workable condition sets a latest time for play, a separate and earlier time for the floodlights to be switched off, and a rule about bookings that run to the last slot. Clubs frequently discover that a 2200 lighting curfew means a 2130 last booking once players have left the court and the car park has emptied.

Where the courts serve an existing club with an established pattern of use, describe that pattern with booking data rather than with adjectives.

Parking, access and peak demand

Court sports generate a sharp, concentrated arrival and departure pattern. Four courts turning over on the hour can put 16 cars on the move in ten minutes, twice an hour, mostly in the evening.

That is not a highway capacity issue on most sites. It is a parking and residential amenity issue, and it is answered with a count of existing spaces, a statement of the booking model, and evidence about what the street looks like at 1900 on a Tuesday. Where parking is already under pressure, a survey carries more weight than a paragraph.

Surface water from new courts

A padel or tennis court is typically 20 by 10 metres for padel and larger for tennis, plus run-off areas and access paths. Several courts together add up to a meaningful area of new hard surface, and lead local flood authorities treat it as such.

The usual answers are porous macadam over a permeable sub-base, or a sealed surface draining to an attenuation feature. Either way the drainage design needs to show the discharge hierarchy was followed, and infiltration tested rather than dismissed.

Where courts replace grass, the biodiversity position also changes. Mandatory biodiversity net gain under the Environment Act 2021 applies to most development, with narrow exemptions including a de minimis threshold for very small habitat losses, and a court built on species-poor grassland will usually exceed it. A Biodiversity Net Gain Assessment has to be completed using the statutory metric by a competent person, and the biodiversity gain plan is approved by the local planning authority after permission is granted.

The document set in practice

For two padel courts with floodlights at an existing sports club, the typical bundle is a planning statement, a noise assessment covering ball strike and voices, a lighting assessment against the obtrusive light guidance, a drainage note or strategy, biodiversity net gain information, and a short transport and parking statement. Add an arboricultural survey where courts sit near trees, which our note on sites with protected trees covers, and heritage evidence where the club sits in a conservation area.

Check the authority's local validation list before submitting. The requirements for sports development vary more than for housing, and an unanswered local list item stops the application before anyone reads the acoustics.

This is general guidance, not legal advice. Check the position with your local planning authority or a qualified professional before relying on it. For specialist technical reports, qualified professional input may be required.

Browse all 66 PlanScope report types to see which documents your courts are likely to need.

PlanScope provides AI-assisted draft reports for planning applications. Reports should be reviewed before submission. We do not guarantee planning approval.